|
Archives - Mouse Parvovirus
Outbreak
Background
Mouse Parvovirus is the third most common infectious pathogen of
mice affecting one or more colonies at 30% of research institutions
and trailing only pinworms and MHV in prevalence. It is clinically
silent, but with an affinity for T cells and a capability of perturbing
immune function. The virus causes infection in immunocompetent mice
lasting up to 6 months and characterized by a 2-6 week period of
intermittent fecal shedding. In mice that are immunosuppressed,
infection and shedding theoretically may be lifelong. PCR of mesenteric
lymph node and serology are used for diagnosis, but up to six weeks
may be required for some mice to show seroconversion. Dissemination
is facilitated by the hardy nature of the agent, which can persist
in the environment for months or more. Exposure to infected mice,
their soiled cages, or contaminated personnel, surfaces or equipment
that have been in contact with infectious mice are most important
for transmission from animal-to-animal. Adult, weanling and neonatal
mice are highly and equally susceptible to infection. Once a colony
is breached, MPV, because of the aforementioned factors, is well-suited
to sustain infection in breeding colonies in barrier cages. Serologic
assessment of sentinel mice in July showed Mouse Parvovirus (MPV)
infection in several mouse colonies. Although sentinels detected
infection only in the Rollins Building and Eye Center, all colonies
should be considered to be infected until shown otherwise. This
ended an era of 12 years of apparent virus-free status of Emory
University mouse colonies. The conduits for entry of pathogens into
our colonies are numerous and are listed in the table below:
Potential Sources of Infection in Rodent Colonies
| Source |
Means |
Primary Control |
1. Exposure to rodents of a
less-defined health
status |
- Rodents obtained from other institutions.
- Rodent pets in labs.
- Rodent pets/colonies at employee homes
- Immunosuppressed rodents bred with rodents with opportunistic
pathogens
- Contaminated cages or personnel emanating from necropsy,
cagewash, quarantine or colonies with enzootic inf.
|
- Quarantine program
- Vendor surveillance
- Pet policy (labs, homes)
- Animal model consultation
- Division of labor; programmatic control of traffic patterns.
- Robotics in cagewash reduces risk of cross-contamination
|
| 2. Laboratories |
- Tumors, tissues, reagents & biologicals.
- Contaminated fomites (equipment, supplies)
|
- Pathogen screening program for biological materials.
- Training/education
|
| 3. Husbandry program |
- Food, bedding & water
- Contaminated crates
- Technical errors during husbandry
- Staff inexperince/instability
- Natural disasters
|
- Sterilize cages, food, water
- Quality control program for autoclaves.
- Water analysis
- Staff training & retention
- Comprehensive sanitation
- Disaster plan
|
| 4. Biohazard Research |
1. Human or murine pathogens
studied for research purposes |
- Appropriate containment
- Training/education
|
5. Breaks at commercial
vendors |
1. Technical errors during
derivation, production, husbandry. |
- Reputable vendors
- Vendor surveillance program
|
| 6. Feral rodents |
- On adjacent grounds
- During transit
|
- Vermin control program
- Elimination of harborage
- Secure facilities
- Comprehensive sanitation
|
| 7. Intermediate hosts |
- On animals
- In the environment
|
- Vermin control program
- Quarantine program
- Vendor surveillance program
|
| 8. Humans |
- Contact during production
- Contact in laboratories
- Contact in the course of providing care; vet staff &
caretakers represent a huge fomite risk.
- Adaptation of human pathogens to infect rodents
|
- Difficult to impossible control
- The challenge of the future
|
| 9. Mutation |
- Mutation of human pathogens to become infectious for rodents.
- Mutation of animal pathogens to become infectious for
rodents
|
- Theoretical, but possible.
- Containment management
|
General MPV Containment and Preventive Practices
All personnel entering mouse rooms must wear a disposable gown,
hair net, surgical-type mask, shoe covers and gloves and must
change such garb if moving from room-to-room. Mice should only
be handled in a biosafety cabinet with gloved hands kept moist
with disinfectant. DAR staff handle mice during cage changes with
forceps soaked in povidone iodine disinfectant. Practices in some
colonies of transferring animals from cage-to-cage by hand have
been discontinued except for newborn litters. Where feasible,
clean cage wash and clean cage storage areas have been secured
and non-DAR staff have been excluded. Provisions of clean cages
and other implements for investigator use are now kept in each
mouse room. Quinticare has been replaced as the disinfectant for
surfaces and gloved hands by Quatricide-PV. It is critically
important to properly use the containment caging system and not
open cages outside of a biosafety cabinet.
Animal Transfers
Under no circumstance may rodents be moved from other institutions,
including the VAMC or Yerkes, to campus without veterinary approval.
Likewise, researchers working with mice at the VAMC or Yerkes
must not subsequently enter animal research facilities on campus
during the same day. On campus, rodents should not be moved from
room-to-room or building-to-building on the Emory campus without
the knowledge and consent of the veterinary staff.
Quarantined Colonies
Quarantined colonies are listed in the table below and have
been identified with signage placed on the room door. All cages
from quarantined rooms are bagged and autoclaved prior to washing.
Research staff should put assembled cages in orange biohazard
bags on the floor next to the hood. DAR staff will process these
cages and remove them on a daily basis. Bags of cages and any
carts, including wheels, must be sprayed with disinfectant prior
to removal from the room. Individuals entering quarantined rooms
are not permitted to enter other mouse rooms. Live mice may not
be removed from quarantined rooms under any circumstance. Tissues
from mice in these rooms may be removed for experimental purposes
in disinfected containers, but may not be inoculated into other
animals. Research implements must be disinfected by wiping with
chemical disinfectant or autoclaving (or equivalent) prior to
removal from the room.
| Building |
Room |
Date of Quarantine Imposition |
| Eye Center |
BT414 |
August 6, 1999 through November 10, 1999 |
| Eye Center |
BT419 |
August 6, 1999 through November 10, 1999 |
| Rollins Center |
G22 |
August 6, 1999 through November 10, 1999 |
| Rollins Center |
G23 |
August 6, 1999 through November 10, 1999 |
| Rollins Center |
G24 |
August 6, 1999 through November 10, 1999 |
Health Assessment
The DAR, through regular and thorough assessment of mice and
biological materials, is in the progress of localizing infection
to specific colonies. It will probably take until mid-September
to bring the aggressive health surveillance campaign to a conclusion.
Although only sentinel mice have been shown to be infected with
MPV to date, all mice should be suspected of infection and handled
accordingly. The current results of the health surveillance effort
are summarized in the table below:
MPV Surveillance Results
| Building |
Period |
Test Subject
|
# Tested
|
# Positive
|
Updated |
| Cell Biology |
July - Oct. |
Sentinels |
19
|
0
|
11/10/99 |
| Cell Biology |
Aug. - Oct. |
Colony mice |
20
|
0
|
10/7/99 |
| Eye |
July |
Sentinels |
4
|
2
|
8/23/99 |
| Eye |
Aug. - Oct. |
Sentinels |
12
|
0
|
11/10/99 |
| Eye |
Aug. - Oct. |
Colony mice |
29
|
0
|
10/7/99 |
| Grady |
July - Oct. |
Sentinels |
14
|
0
|
11/10/99 |
| Grady |
Aug. - Oct. |
Colony mice |
18
|
0
|
10/7/99 |
| Physiology |
July - Oct. |
Sentinels |
2
|
0
|
11/10/99 |
| Physiology |
Aug. - Oct. |
Colony mice |
5
|
0
|
10/7/99 |
| Rollins |
July |
Sentinels* |
11
|
7
|
8/23/99 |
| Rollins |
July |
Sentinels Cohorts* |
16
|
0
|
10/7/99 |
| Rollins |
August |
Sentinels |
5
|
1
|
9/8/99 |
| Rollins |
Sept. - Oct. |
Sentinels |
69
|
0
|
11/10/99 |
| Rollins |
Aug. - Oct. |
Colony mice |
268
|
0
|
10/7/99 |
| Winship |
July - Oct. |
Sentinels |
39
|
0
|
11/10/99 |
| Winship |
Aug. - Oct. |
Colony mice |
67
|
0
|
10/7/99 |
| WMRB |
July - Oct. |
Sentinels |
71
|
0
|
11/10/99 |
| WMRB |
Aug. - Oct. |
Colony mice |
31
|
0
|
10/7/99 |
| All |
Aug. - Sept. |
Biological Materials |
33
|
0
|
9/16/99 |
*Sentinel cohorts were mice received from the same source
and at the same time as the sentinels originally shown to be MPV
seropositive in July. The sentinel cohorts were used as sentinels
in other colonies in Rollins, but all were removed from their
respective colonies in August, isolated, tested for MPV in October,
and shown to be seronegative.
Eradication Program
Once infected colonies are localized, impacted investigators
will be informed and consulted regarding the disposition of infected
mice. In general, infected mice will be identified and either
euthanized or designated for depopulation through research attrition.
Disease-free breeders will be identified and programmatically
and physically isolated from potentially infected stock and continually
monitored. However, no action will be taken without consultation
with the involved investigators.
|